Prediction of Matteo Viola vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Viola vs N. Fatic

Matteo Viola
ITA
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
38
Age
31
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
212
118
Best Rank
191
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$206.4K
Career Money
$74.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic
BIH
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
38
Age
31
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
212
118
Best Rank
191
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$206.4K
Career Money
$74.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Viola 0 - 1 Fatic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matteo Viola winning 0 and Nerman Fatic winning 2. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Matteo Viola was at the Verona Challenger, 17-08-2021, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Viola | 0 |
| Fatic | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Verona Challenger(08-17-21)
Nerman Fatic
6
6
Matteo Viola
0
1
M. Viola vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
M. Viola vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matteo Viola has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 44.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matteo Viola, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matteo Viola has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 53.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matteo Viola has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nerman Fatic winning 72.31% (W/L 47/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matteo Viola has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 119/82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/11). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Matteo Viola has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Matteo Viola winning 0 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Matteo Viola winning 0 and Nerman Fatic winning 2.
- The last match between Matteo Viola and Nerman Fatic was at the Verona Challenger, 17-08-2021, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:23.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matteo Viola has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 326.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matteo Viola has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 81% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matteo Viola has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 30.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Matteo Viola vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Viola vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 1 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:0:23 | Average Match Time | 1:0:23 |
| 68% (43/63) | 1st Serve % | 69% (24/35) |
| 47% (20/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 83% (20/24) |
| 35% (7/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 0% (0/1) | Break Pts Won % | 46% (6/13) |
| 26% (9/35) | Return Points Win % | 57% (36/63) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Viola 0%, Fatic 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Viola 0%, Fatic 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Viola 0%, Fatic 61%.
M. Viola Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-6(3) | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-6 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

M. Viola vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.47% (563/490) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.47% (404/287) |
| 52.52% (1293/1169) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.49% (890/658) |
| 51.50% (11695/11015) | Games Win/Loss | 53.03% (7602/6734) |
| 59.20% (119/82) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 53.42% (344/300) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 48.95% (93/97) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.48% (20/26) |
| 38.89% (7/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1006 | Aces Total | 1598 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2685 | Total Double Faults | 1517 |
| 1:1:45 | Average Match Time | 1:20:1 |
| 585.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.22 |
| 66% (32316/49106) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23791/35820) |
| 63% (20444/32316) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15579/23791) |
| 46% (7794/16790) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5772/12029) |
| 45% (2453/5479) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1969/4222) |
| 43% (20688/48079) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15618/36165) |
| 33.33% (13/26) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 29.41% (5/12) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 50.70% (36/35) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 47.44% (232/257) | Challenger W/L | 52.89% (119/106) |
| 63.39% (277/160) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 53% (554/1036) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/662) |
| 33% (3/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 51% (138/268) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 52% (186/355) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/189) |
| 83% (539/450) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (394/348) |
| 16% (539/88) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (394/42) |
| 22% (514/112) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (297/57) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 30 Nov, 11:00 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 07:15 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 12:00 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 03:00 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025
Top Predictions Today
23:20
H2H 0-0
05:30
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
15:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Gwalior
India
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola